Skip to main content

CSS Specificity


Many time different CSS rules overlap on one or more element. And some people always get confuse about, which rule will take higher priority then other and why? CSS Specificity is the answer of all these kind of questions.

As the name suggest, the CSS rule which is more specific to the element will take higher priority then other. Means something like “#some_id{}” will always take higher priority then “*{}” universal selector.  And if duplicate rules are define then the last rule will be applied to the element.

The following list of selectors is by increasing specificity:
  • Type selector (e.g., div) and pseudo-elements in selector (e.g., :after)
  • Class selectors (e.g., .some_class), attributes selectors (e.g., [type=”radio”]) and pseudo-class selector (e.g., :hover)
  • Id selectors (e.g., #some_id)

ID takes higher priority then Class, Type and Universal selector (Note: Universal selector has no effect on specificity, see below special conditions). 

If duplicate rules are given, then last rule will override the earlier one.

Some special conditions while deciding the selector specificity:
  1. No effect on specificity: Universal selector (*), combinators (+, >, ~, ‘  ‘) and negation pseudo-class (:not())
  2. Inline style always overwrite any styles in external stylesheets and it has highest specificity.
  3. “!important” declaration overrides any other declarations. Although has nothing to do with specificity, but it is a exception.

But some time use case become more complex then this, and we have to calculate the selector’s specificity accurately.

Calculating specificity

As per the W3C Recommendation, selector’s specificity is calculated as follows
  • Count the number of ID selectors in the selector (= a)
  • Count the number of class selectors, attributes selectors, and pseudo-classes in the selector (= b)
  • Count the number of type selectors and pseudo-elements in the selector (= c)
  • Ignore the universal selector

Selectors inside the negation pseudo-class (i.e  :not(x)) are counted like any other, but the negation itself does not count as a pseudo-class.
Concatenating the three numbers a-b-c (in a number system with a large base) gives the specificity.


After calculating the specificity "div#div" has highest specificity then others, so this rule will be applied,
1. div         - specificity: 1
2. div#div  - specificity: 101
3. #div       - specificity: 100

Some Examples for specificity calculation:

* { }                       /* a=0 b=0 c=0 -> specificity =   0 */
li { }                      /* a=0 b=0 c=1 -> specificity =   1 */
li:first-line { }           /* a=0 b=0 c=2 -> specificity =   2 */
ul li { }                   /* a=0 b=0 c=2 -> specificity =   2 */
ul ol+li { }                /* a=0 b=0 c=3 -> specificity =   3 */
h1 + *[rel=up] { }          /* a=0 b=1 c=1 -> specificity =  11 */
ul ol { }            /* a=0 b=1 c=3 -> specificity =  13 */ { }            /* a=0 b=2 c=1 -> specificity =  21 */
style=””                    /* highest specificity        =1000 */
p { }                       /* a=0 b=0 c=1 -> specificity =   1 */
div p { }                   /* a=0 b=0 c=2 -> specificity =   2 */
.sith                       /* a=0 b=1 c=1 -> specificity =  10 */
div p.sith { }              /* a=0 b=1 c=2 -> specificity =  12 */
#sith { }                   /* a=1 b=0 c=0 -> specificity = 100 */
#sith:not(div) { }          /* a=1 b=0 c=1 -> specificity = 101 */
body #darkside .sith p { }  /* a=1 b=1 c=2 -> specificity = 112 */


Popular posts from this blog

ERROR: Ignored call to 'alert()'. The document is sandboxed, and the 'allow-modals' keyword is not set.

Recently I found this issue while writing code snippet in "JSFiddle". And after searching, found this was happening because of new feature added in "Chrome 46+". But at the same time Chrome doesn't have support for "allow-modals" property in "sandbox" attribute. Chromium issue for above behavior: To make it work you have to add "allow-scripts allow-modals" in "sandbox" attribute, and use "window.alert" instead of "alert". <!-- Sandbox frame will execute javascript and show modal dialogs --> <iframe sandbox="allow-scripts allow-modals" src="iframe.html"> </iframe> Feature added: Block modal dialog inside a sandboxed iframe. Link: Feature working Demo page:

Application Design Notes

Don’t be afraid to write your own code, but be absolutely sure you need to Don't reinvent the wheel Learn more about your libraries and take full advantage  Date time calculation is hard ( leap second ,  leap year ), use trusted library  js-joda ,  momentJs ,  joda (java) Simple is better than perfect (nearly) every time If you can deliver a sub-optimal solution (that solves the problem but has known limitation) in a week instead of a full featured one in a month DO, IT Simple system are Easy to reason about  Easy to debug Easy to refactor Easy to learn Simple doesn't mean you skip good engineering, but you can use duct tape. Build things the right way from the start, refactoring is hard and expensive Security Manage and store passwords securely Telemetry Common retrofitting "grunt work" Internationalization + localization Web Content Accessibility Factoring and styling HTML UI Adding unit test to an existing codebase LOG LOG LOG Log, but do it right We spend lot of t

How to store user password at server!!!

Trick is, you should never store user password… never ever. Now the real question is, then how to authenticate and authorize the user with password. And answer is when user enter the password, we should encrypt the password and store the hints. So next time when user enter the password we follow the same process and compare hints, if both hints are same then password is matched, else it is wrong password. Next question will be, what kind of hints, and how to generate these hints. In simple term hints are the obfuscated and fragmented form of user password. And very important part is hints generation process, which have to be collision resistant , means there will be very less possibility to find the data which generate same hints (like Cryptographic hashing functions ). Below is the simple checklist of password hashing and storing, which you should always keep in mind. PS You're Probably Storing Passwords Incorrectly Storing Passwords - done rig